Skip to main content
Steady at the Top
← All articles

Who should own decisions while a restructure is underway?

Assign temporary decision owners during a restructure by naming the decisions that cannot wait, their authority boundaries, and their expiry dates. Communicate the arrangement to affected teams. Review real cases so temporary ownership prevents delay without becoming an undocumented permanent hierarchy.

Role ambiguity is uncertainty about the behavior expected from a position. The APA’s 2018 role-ambiguity entry describes that lack of clarity. During a restructure, assigning a temporary owner answers who may decide now; naming a future department does not. Distinguish ambiguity from role conflict, where two clear expectations are incompatible. An interim decision can need clarification even when the future structure is settled.

Stop routing the current week through your private messages

Composite scenario, not a client case: You leave a family conversation to approve another ordinary request because two departments are between leaders. Each assumes the other will take over soon. The restructure has a future chart, but the current week still needs decisions with accountable owners.

Use the interrupted family conversation to identify the request that lacked coverage. Record its decision category, not the personal inconvenience of receiving it. Ask why the request reached you: no owner, conflicting owners or an exception outside delegated authority. Each requires a different correction. Avoid transferring every incoming question to one interim leader merely because that person reliably answers messages.

Separate temporary authority from permanent status

Colquitt’s 2001 study of organizational justice distinguishes procedure, outcome, treatment and explanation. Apply those questions to how you allocate interim responsibility. Explain the basis of the assignment and give the owner a route to raise a capacity problem. An interim assignment should not be presented as evidence that a permanent appointment has already been made, particularly when that decision remains subject to another process.

Industrial/organizational psychology, the psychology of work and organizations, helps examine whether authority and expectations match during transition. The temporary ownership register below is a proposed operating tool. It has no validated fairness score. Use it to identify a covered decision, its limits and its end condition. A complete register should make the next request actionable, rather than merely giving the transition another document.

Name the decision before choosing the interim owner

The choice is who can act during the transition. Use the consequence and information needs of each decision rather than granting broad temporary authority through an informal title.

Start with requests expected before the permanent handover. Distinguish an operational exception from a change in contract, staffing or governance. Identify who can authorize each type. The register can point to an existing specialist route instead of delegating it anew. Do not use one broad temporary title to imply powers that the organization has not approved for that person.

For each category, record the information the owner needs and the contributor responsible for it. If finance must confirm an exposure before a delivery exception is approved, make that dependency part of the route. Check that the contributor can answer within the relevant operating window. Otherwise, the named owner remains unable to decide and the request will return to you under a different label.

Use the temporary decision-ownership register

  1. List decisions needing coverage. Identify recurring requests likely to arrive during the transition and the consequence of leaving each unanswered. Use actual recent cases to define the categories. Separate decisions that can wait for the new structure from those that need coverage now. Do not begin by filling every future leadership box. Build a register of current work, including any specialist approval that must remain with an existing authorized owner.

  2. Choose a capable temporary owner. Confirm access to relevant information, sufficient capacity and the authority required for the category. Ask the person to describe a case they would be unable to decide. Identify a backup and explain when that backup acts. A person’s willingness to help is useful, but it does not establish a mandate. Obtain the actual approval needed before directing teams to rely on the interim owner.

  3. State the boundary and inputs. Describe what the owner may decide and the condition requiring escalation. Name the contributors whose information is necessary. Agree when their input is needed and what happens if it does not arrive. Keep consultation distinct from a second approval unless approval is required. Write the boundary in terms the request originator can apply without first asking the CEO which category the request belongs to.

  4. Communicate and test the arrangement. Tell the affected teams where covered requests go and which earlier instruction is replaced. Walk one live operating case through the approved route with the responsible participants. Check that the owner can obtain the input and issue a decision that others recognize. Record a mismatch instead of describing the announcement as implementation. Correct the route before applying it to more consequential cases.

  5. Expire or renew explicitly. Give the assignment a review date and a condition for handover. At that point, inspect unresolved requests and confirm who receives them next. If continued interim coverage is necessary, authorize the extension and communicate its scope. Do not rely on the owner noticing a new chart and inferring that their responsibility ended. Retire obsolete instructions so the permanent and temporary routes do not remain active together.

When a request arrives before coverage is complete, make the immediate authorized decision and record the gap it exposed. Give any temporary exception a clear limit. Do not let a one-off CEO approval become the assumed route for every later request. Tell the proposed interim owner whether they now have authority for the category or whether the case remains an exception requiring your decision.

Communicate the temporary boundary with its expiry

Use this proposed statement with a named decision category, actual owner and agreed end condition. Avoid sending an interim appointment notice that omits what the person can authorize.

Until the handover condition is met, this person owns these decisions within this boundary. Escalate exceptions through this route. The arrangement will be reviewed on the stated date, rather than continuing through assumption.

Ask a request originator to explain where they will send the next covered case and what information must accompany it. Then ask the interim owner to describe when they would escalate. Resolve any difference before declaring coverage active. Staff do not need private reasons for the appointment to use the route, but they do need a reliable answer about authority while the restructure continues.

Cover delivery exceptions without transferring contract authority

Hypothetical application: Two customer teams are merging. The CEO names an interim owner for delivery exceptions while retaining a separate approval route for contract changes. A real request reveals a missing finance input, which is added before the process is used more widely.

In the merging-team hypothetical, use one delivery request to test the boundary. Ask whether the requested action changes an agreed contract or stays inside operating discretion. Make the required finance input visible. If the case crosses into retained authority, route that part separately. A successful simple request does not show that the interim owner can approve every exception the merged teams might encounter.

Publish operating instructions without announcing private employment decisions

Tell affected teams which requests the interim owner receives, how to reach the backup and when the arrangement ends. Keep negotiations about a future leadership role within their authorized audience. If staff ask whether the interim appointment guarantees the permanent job, answer only from the approved position. Do not imply a promise through public congratulations or a title that goes beyond the actual temporary mandate.

Protect capacity and formal approval boundaries

Do not give responsibility to the person with the least ability to refuse extra work. Avoid temporary authority without an end condition. Obtain appropriate review where decision ownership changes employment or governance obligations.

Obtain employment or governance advice when an interim assignment changes obligations or formal authority. This register is not authorization to alter terms. Have the qualified people lead review workload implications with the proposed owner. Identify which existing responsibility will receive coverage if necessary. Assigning an interim role to someone who cannot refuse extra work is not a substitute for confirming the resources needed to carry it out.

Review the requests that stalled

Review delayed cases, repeated escalations, and whether permanent owners have taken over. Remove obsolete instructions so staff do not keep using an expired route.

Inspect a small set of actual requests after the route begins. Identify cases that waited for information, went to two owners or returned to the CEO. Ask the interim owner which decision they lacked authority to make. Revise that specific boundary or dependency. Do not respond to every delay by broadening authority; some categories should continue to reach a specialist or formally designated approver.

Check whether employees still use an older approval route because it remains in a form, shared instruction or manager message. Replace the obsolete instruction and tell the owner receiving the stray request how to redirect it. Review cases refused by the interim owner as well as cases approved. A lack of visible escalation cannot establish that requests were handled if they never reached the new route.

Vroom and Jago’s 2007 discussion of situational leadership treats the situation as relevant to leadership decisions. Use that perspective when choosing an interim owner: ask about the information and participation the decision requires. Do not present the paper as endorsing a universal delegation pattern. The register must reflect this transition’s actual authority, resources and decisions rather than a preferred management style.

Hand over or renew the mandate explicitly

Use decision-rights thresholds to refine exceptions. Check the wider restructuring plan before transferring permanent responsibilities. If coverage depends on someone whose future is uncertain, address critical-staff retention separately. Keep guilt around a leadership exit out of the logic used to allocate operating authority. The interim route must serve the work that continues.

At expiry, confirm the permanent owner and redirect the open cases. If the restructure is not ready, renew the interim mandate with a reason and another review point. Do not let silence extend it. A temporary owner needs to know whether they are still responsible, and request originators need one current route after the handover.

Sources

Steady at the Top